I'm guessing this is because the mathematics behind the nurbs curves is better suited in producing smooth results. I cannot seem to get as good a result when using traditional curves / splines creating as a sketch as I can when using nurbs curves within the Style tool. Its a basic 'top hat' method.but works well. I have uploaded my general method so far to grab CAD (link below). I also find that creating surfaces directly within the Style affords me less control over the surface. I find this gives me the smoothest result. So far with Creo I have been using a combination of curves created in Style and traditional boundary surfaces.
And yes.three sided surfaces should always avoided where possible, but I found that using the Fill command in Solidworks produced great results and therefore there was often now need to spend more time generating further geom. Yes the "surface" option in ISDX works like fill option in solidworks.you can just select the curves and it would fill it with a surface.
5:03 PM (in response to MAGNUS SALOMONSSON) See page 3 for the actual comparison and images of the SW Fill Surface command.ģ5. I do not use ISDX so the request is for the surface module in Foundation or what it's called nowadays. The outcome surprised many of the long time users and this I believe is an excellent benchmark feature that hopefully could be introduced in Creo SURFACE. The suite consists of apps, each delivering a distinct set of capabilities for a user role within product development. There was a fierce discussion on this topic many years ago vs Solidworks Fill Surface command It is very limited only being able to do this feature on a planar sketch. Re: Enhancement Requests for Creo - Summer 2013 TC Meetings I asked about this feature as an enhancement.ģ3. Saw another thread which I was part of on PTC Community.
0 kommentar(er)
